Latest Financial Planning News
Hot Issues
'Huge' professional risk in SG delays, big four firm warns
What a financial adviser can add to your portfolio's returns.
ATO updates crypto guidance
Reverse mortgages: Short-term gain, long-term pain
ATO set sights on 27,000 funds in ongoing crackdown
ATO zones in on hundreds of newly created reserves
A dynamic approach to retiree spending and drawdowns
Your investment freedom-maker
Living expenses for retirees on the rise
Still a long and bumpy road to travel on the way to a U.S.-China deal
Smart spouse investing
How financial advice helps create wealth.
What the ATO will be keeping an eye on in FY19
This information will turn you into a fireside expert.
Examining the S in SMSF
Trade tensions to choke global growth: Moody’s
Tools for budgeting, cash flow, Super and more ….
Statistics show SMSFs not just for the rich
SMSFs lose thousands in property, investment scams
The good, bad, and potentially ugly for SMSFs
What politicians use to tell you how Australia is going.
Estate planning in the new environment
ATO issues alert on super, tax scams
SMSFs: Our 'hardest' jobs
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 2 of 2016
Articles
Making investing a family affair
Super and divorce: a personal finance issue
Market Update - May 2016
ASIC flags SMSF investors in scam risk
Older, greyer and still working
Working and contributing to super past 65
The pitfalls of part-year pensions
Replenishing SMSF memberships
Budget will hit 15% of SMSFs
The insidious side of low interest rates
Market Update - April 2016
Budget 2016-17
Do investment principles stand test of time?
Estate Planning - early inheritance
US economy will bend, not break
A detailed look at the ATO’s new LRBA guidance
Defying life's blueprint
ATO continuing lodgement crackdown
Another twist on the gender savings gap
Market Update – March 2016
Going solo
Use our online budgeting tools to help plan your future.
Age Pension means-test prevents rational decision-making
Changing times for super collectables
Preservation Age Rule
Why investing for retirement isn't just about super
Why investing for retirement isn't just about super

 

Financial advisers understand the value of setting long-term objectives.


Which is why there should be general support for the notion of setting a long-term objective for the superannuation system and enshrining it in legislation.



       


The Financial System Inquiry chaired by David Murray recommended that the primary objective of the Australian system ought to be "to provide income in retirement to substitute or supplement the age pension".


The Federal Government has begun the process of consulting on what both the primary objective ought to be along with several subsidiary objectives that get down into more detail that would ultimately allow future policy changes to be evaluated against.


The government has also flagged a number of other issues for discussion - one of which is the critical element of adequacy which fundamentally underpins ideas of how to measure if the super system is meeting its core objective.


There are two quite different perspectives. There is the government's public policy perspective and the notion of how much of the age pension is effectively being replaced by private savings - both mandatory and voluntary - via superannuation. 


Then there is the individual perspective - what does an adequate retirement income look like to you.


A key issue is that there is no consensus on how to measure adequacy - for instance, the OECD uses a replacement rate measure. For example, it could be to aim for 70 per cent of your final salary before retirement. That by its nature is a blunt measure given the retirement income of someone on average weekly earnings versus someone earning a high salary will be vastly different in dollar and lifestyle terms yet have the same replacement rate.


An alternative is to aspire to giving everyone a target level of income which is perhaps in line with measures like the ASFA comfortable retirement index that is currently $43,184 a year for a single retiree who owns their own home.


They are two very different approaches and outcomes. 


There is a common point of tension in much of the debate around super issues - be it adequacy or tax concessions - because it becomes a tug of war between the collective versus the individual.


Enshrining the core objective of superannuation in legislation is long overdue and it carries with it the hope that it will help provide some distance for superannuation from the short-term pressure of the annual federal budget/revenue cycle, because there is no doubt that the constant tinkering with rules is undermining confidence in what is by nature a long-term contract of trust between government and fund member.


We will know the government's position on the core objectives of superannuation in a matter of weeks along with any changes to tax concessions.


Once the collective guard rails are in plain sight, the focus will inexorably shift to the individual impacts and objectives. 


Superannuation naturally plays a key role in most Australian's planning for retirement. But it is by no means the only form of saving for retirement - just ask any small business owner.


At the end of the day, superannuation is simply a tax wrapper. It makes good sense to have money inside super to take advantage of the concessional tax rates, but depending on what the government decides, there may well be tighter limits on how much you can contribute or other reasons to invest more outside the super system.


For individual investors, the government's impending policy announcements are likely to be a catalyst to review existing arrangements. Inevitably, when super rules change, there will be technical issues to work through, but for individual investors the value will come from developing an overall plan for retirement savings and not just a super strategy.


 


By Robin Bowerman
Smart Investing 
Principal & Head of Retail, Vanguard Investments Australia
21 March 2016 




2nd-April-2016
 

Investorplan is an Authorised Representative of GWM Adviser Services Limited trading as MLC Financial Planning | ABN 28 056 426 932 | an Australian Financial Services Licensee with its Registered Office at 105-153 Miller Street North Sydney NSW 2060
email: ownyourfuture@investorplan.com.au
General Advice Warning | Terms & Conditions | Legal Statement | Privacy Policy |Site by PlannerWeb