Latest Financial Planning News
Hot Issues
Australia’s $4bn Super blackhole impacting self-employed most
The proper help can be a benefit - age pension
SMSFs on ATO’s radar in cryptocurrency review
Limited recourse borrowing arrangements - LRBAs
What a financial planner does to help.
Goodbye to ad-hoc portfolios
Wanted: More voluntary super contributions
Australia by the numbers – May Update
Federal Budget 2019 - Overview
How the 2019 Federal Budget affects you
The problem with getting to 53 years of age.
Paying for health care in retirement
Personal super contributions and the 10% test
What investors can expect as key moves affecting markets await
ATO flags PAYG obligations for SMSFs with legacy pensions
Don't just plan for retirement; Plan for your life
Consumers misunderstand types of advice
Budget Time - How's Australia going?
When super isn't compulsory
Investors brace for Brexit - deal or no deal
ATO identifies SMSF contravention red flags
Extra website resources and tools is one way we offer you and your family more.
Tax and estate planning traps flagged with pension restructures
A checklist for a healthy financial year
High-risk LRBAs, TBAR on the ATO’s radar this year
All you need to know about how Australia is going.
Royal Commission report makes super fee recommendations
Four tips for boosting your super balance
Articles archive
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Limited recourse borrowing arrangements - LRBAs

Transfer of loan amounts flagged as vital compliance step for LRBAs



       


 


With greater numbers of SMSFs turning to related-party loans after several banks withdrew from the SMSF lending space, a law firm has stressed the importance of ensuring that an actual transfer of money has taken place.


In an online article, Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers explained that, with borrowing options becoming more limited and SMSFs using related-party loans to fund property purchases, it’s vital that SMSF professionals and their clients are undertaking all the necessary compliance steps.


“When it comes to related-party borrowing, the importance of actually transferring the loan amount from the lender to the borrower, or to the vendor at the direction of the borrower, is sometimes overlooked, particularly in the circumstances where the same individual is the vendor, the lender and the fund trustee,” Townsends said.


The law firm cautioned that, if SMSFs are considering these types of transactions, just having formal loan documents noting the arm’s length loan terms may not be sufficient.


“The ATO’s current view is that there needs to be a transfer of money from the lender to the borrower as a necessary feature of a borrowing as referred to in the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993,” it said.


“Journal entries or set-offs do not meet the requirements of a borrowing. The ATO has relied on old rulings in other contexts to distinguish loans from financial accommodation.”


The law firm gave an example of John, the sole member of an SMSF and sole director of the fund’s corporate trustee.


“After seeking financial and tax advice on the benefits of owning a property in his SMSF, John decides to sell his investment property valued at $1 million to his SMSF. As his SMSF’s available balance is $200,000 short of the market value, he will enter into a contract with the SMSF for a loan of $200,000 to fund its purchase using a limited recourse borrowing arrangement,” Townsends explained.


“In lieu of paying the loan amount to the SMSF, he received $800,000 as the vendor from the SMSF on settlement, the $1 million sale price less his ‘loan’ of $200,000 to the fund. But is that $200,000 really a loan?”


Townsends warned that, in this example, John should have actually transferred $200,000 from his personal account to the fund as an advance of the loan amount, and received the whole $1 million on the settlement of the property sale contract. 


“If the transaction is deemed to be an arrangement other than a loan, the LRBA exception under the SIS Act will not apply and this may expose the SMSF trustee to civil or criminal penalties and place the SMSF’s complying status at risk,” it said.


 


Miranda Brownlee
18 April 2019
SMSFadviser.com


 




17th-May-2019
 

Investorplan is an Authorised Representative of GWM Adviser Services Limited trading as MLC Financial Planning | ABN 28 056 426 932 | an Australian Financial Services Licensee with its Registered Office at 105-153 Miller Street North Sydney NSW 2060
email: ownyourfuture@investorplan.com.au
General Advice Warning | Terms & Conditions | Legal Statement | Privacy Policy |Site by PlannerWeb